Archive for the 'Picking Up The Pieces' Category

RETURN TO SENDER

Tuesday, October 3rd, 2006 by PH Fred

So how hard can the mail be? Rain. Snow. Sleet. Barking dogs and brown paper subscriptions. A relatively gruntled situation. No reason for dissing the grunt. No reason to wield firearms or kill coworkers. Likewise, for the average resident or mail recipient, the mail is part of life that is both assumed and presumed; well, sometimes, if a nutty fruitcake or holiday beef log then even consumed. A few pieces of treasure snuggled in a mound of junk mail and solicitations. Perhaps the wife’s VS catalog, maybe a chance to win the sweepstakes and a visit from Ed McMahon. Usually the day’s delivery is just a loquacious love-note from an unrequited bill collector or a diatribe from an emotional, ersatz musically, disturbed fan. Oh the joys of semi-fame!. Despite the joys of e-mail, the crisp physical letter from a stalker is always a sensory joy. The smell of cheap perfume on a tear, lipstick, or occasionally blood stained letter. Tsk. Tsk. Oh the good ole days pre Katrina when my fans and stalkage were a blur of body parts, threatening letters, and packing peanuts! Where have all the flowers gone? Well, I just know they have not been delivered here… by the way, I hear that the cemetery is not receiving packages either.

Somehow all that is forgotten in the Big Easy on October 2, 2006. One year and one month and a few sheckles post Katrina (nice polysyndeton, eh?), my mail service is still sketchy, as my home floats from second city to third world but not quite back again. Two packages are M.I.A. My headshots and xylophone (??) were recently returned to senders because, according to the USP (and UPS), I no longer exist. It’s as if I’m out of bizniz. It’s as if I’m dead. But trust me, my voter registration and tax bills will miraculously arrive even after I shed this proverbial mortal coil. Heck in certain parts of the state I’ll probably still be able to and shall vote. How’s that for suffering suffrage? How’s that for purple prose?

Anyway … it’s as if the paperwork and bureaucracy and cluster fudge of FEMA has spilled over into other seemingly efficient operations. Houses, blocks, neighborhoods, and apparently small dynasties (aka the kingdom of me) have disappeared from the map - literally, figuratively, and rand mcnallishly. The computer GPS has erased us. What can Brown do for me? Bring me my friggin’xylophone (why I ordered one or why I’m upset now that it is lost I don’t quite know… but I have the right to bear one, play one, bang one, and even ship and receive one .) Has the Brown of UPS been replaced or re-regulated by the Brown Michael of incompetence? I know UPS and USP are notb the same. But they are. They are. They both function on the same misinformation about whether we exist and where we exist. The postman may only ring twice, but the gov’t seems to keep screwing up again and again and again, Ad infinitum. Ad nausea. Add postage. BLOG THIS!

Central City Block Party - Address the Digital Divide and Win a Free Laptop!

Sunday, May 11th, 2008 by Loki

While HumidCity is not directly involved with the projects below their stated aims are close enough to ours that we felt the need to share this:

On Tuesday, May 13th, One Economy Corporation - a global nonprofit organization that uses innovative approaches to deliver the power of technology and information to low-income people, giving them valuable tools for building better lives - will launch its Community Fellows Program at a community-wide block party celebration in Central City. Residents will have the opportunity to win a brand new Dell laptop and enjoy free music, food and beverages.


At the event One Economy aims to share, in collaboration with community partners, a vision to use the internet and technology to help residents and communities prepare for disasters but also increase their access to opportunities and promote broadband connectivity in every home. Through the Community Fellows program, a team of qualified local individuals will be deployed throughout New Orleans to help residents prepare emergency plans. 

WIN A FREE LAPTOP!!!

Free music, food and beverages provided


Join HOPE Community Credit Union, Central City Renaissance Alliance, LANO, OC Merchants and Business Association, ACORN and One Economy as we present the Community Fellows Initiative.


Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2008

Time:  3:00 pm to 5:00 pm

Location: 1726 Oretha Castle Haley Blvd. @ Felicity

Next to HOPE Community Credit Union

Central City, New Orleans


* You must be present to win a FREE LAPTOP!  Grab a raffle ticket when you get to the block party.


Learn about the Community Fellows Initiative which will better prepare the residents of the New Orleans area and neighboring communities for emergencies.  To find out how you can get one-on-one help to create an emergency preparedness plan email us at community fellowsinfo@one-economy.com.  You can also learn about Bring IT Home America, One Economy’s national initiative that brings together government, business and nonprofit resources to expand techcnology and the opportunities it creates in communities like Central City.

Crime, Fear, and Orwell

Wednesday, May 7th, 2008 by Loki

Violence. It surrounds us these days more than ever. From the vicious slayings of the city streets to the consistent array of rapes and hazings at Tulane University we are suffering a deluge of it. Both the city and the University desperately need enforcement. This is an issue with pre storm roots.

Along with the violence comes the pungent aroma of fear. I know I am subject to it.

City streets seem darker and more threatening than ever and small movements caught in the eye’s corner make you jump almost out of your skin. Everyone has those moments whether they admit it out loud or not. Its part of life in the city, especially these days.

So how far do we allow fear to propel us? Where do we find the line between making ourselves safe from extraordinary circumstances and sacrificing our liberty for perceived safety? Ben Franklin once said that those who abandon liberty for safety deserve neither. But how to stay firm in that resolve when you have a family?

Citizens for 1 Greater New Orleans and the Holy Cross Neighborhood Association want us to sign their petition to keep the National Guard in NOLA. With my office located in the Bywater and a lovely wife at home Uptown I find myself supporting that aim. At the same time I cringe at the thought of endorsing the concept of armed troops on American soil, especially ours.

In the French Quarter a new initiative has begun - cameras in every window. QuarterSafe is something I only just discovered when they sent me an email about an hour ago. Its a movement to have people hook up cameras to their computers watching the streets of the Vieux Carre. “Orwellian,” was my first thought. “Could it work?” was my second. After reading in the Times-Picayune that violent crime is up 20% and rape is up 85% I find I am not not as secure in my ideals as I would like to be. Perhaps the 20+ funerals I have been party to since the levee failure has something to do with it as well.

I am merely ruminating here. I have no magic solution, no wave of a Harry Potter wand to dispel the complexity of what faces us. I just know this:

I must not fear.
Fear is the mind-killer.
Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration.
We must face our fears and determine our proper course. In the final analysis it is a dialectic between each individual and their own conscience.
So, how do YOU feel about the New Orleans Brand ™?
Loki, HumidCity Founder
[EDIT: And then Karen G. points me at this as a coda.]

Showing the Charter School Love

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008 by Gbitch

My daughter goes to a charter school. I got an email the other day about tomorrow’s rally in Baton Rouge in celebration of Charter Schools Week (I’ve never heard of this one and wonder why it is the same damn week as Teacher Appreciation Week):

Louisiana Celebrates National Charter Schools Week Wednesday, May 7, 11:30 a.m.
Steps of State Capitol, Baton Rouge

With: State Senator Cheryl Gray
House Speaker Pro Tem Karen Carter
Algiers Charter School Association
Citizens for 1 Greater New Orleans
Eastbank Collaborative of Charter Schools
Louisiana Association of Public Charter Schools
Louisiana Charter School Association
New Schools New Orleans
and others!

Open to the public
And then at the end, the email says:
We intend to:
  • Increase awareness that charter schools are public schools;
  • Advocate for more favorable policy environment for charter schools in Louisiana; and
  • Show how the quality and accountability of charter schools is transforming public education in Louisiana.
Even if I could be there, I wouldn’t. Why? Because charter schools here are NOT public schools. More than a handful of charters, regardless of the supervising agency, have selective admissions and even those that don’t get to cap their enrollment where they choose. They are not obligated to provide for special needs students (at either end of the spectrum) and a fractured “system” makes providing that extra care harder or impractical–how can one single school afford a full-time special education teacher paid out of its current budget for 3 or even 10 students? How can that expense be justified to the 99+% of parents whose children do not need these services? Also, where’s the accountability if no research has been done and is only going to be started at some point in the future AND when schools can provide whatever data they want however they want? There is no standard system for comparing current charter schools or comparing schools now to schools before (and I get this from the Cowen Institute report, not my ass)? A public school takes every child who walks in and educates every child that stays, regardless of need. That’s what public schools are supposed to be about and for. And do we need a “more favorable policy environment” for charters in LA? There are bills in the state legislature now which aim to make our charter school “system” permanent regardless of results, flaws or failures. And no transformation of public education has occurred yet. From my vantage point, we have a few innovators but mostly we have new themes for schools–social justice, college prep (whatever that means), math and science, math and business, art and technology. A theme is not a reform.

There is a place for charters in a public school system. But that doesn’t mean that charters should become a school system. How can we be sure all our children are educated if they are divided into fiefdoms or placed on their own islands? And it will take years, at least one generation, for charter schools to change NO public schools from being schools of last resort (a Cowen Institute phrase) to just plain schools.

You will not see this black mother at that rally.

pic cropped from SanFranAnnie

Sorry, Margaret

Monday, May 5th, 2008 by Gbitch
Reading First, included in the No Child Left Behind legislation, does not increase reading comprehension. When I first saw the story this morning, Margaret Spellings, Secretary of Education, still had made no public statement about the study:
“Reading First did not improve students’ reading comprehension,” concluded the report, which was mandated by Congress and carried out by the Department of Education’s research arm, the Institute of Education Sciences. “The program did not increase the percentages of students in grades one, two or three whose reading comprehension scores were at or above grade level.”

The study, “Reading First Impact Study: Interim Report,” analyzes the performance of students in 12 states who were in grades one to three during the 2004-5 and 2005-6 school years. It is to be followed early in 2009 with a final report that will analyze additional follow-up data, the institute’s director, Grover J. Whitehurst said.

Secretary of Education Margaret Spellings and President Bush have consistently extolled Reading First as a highly effective program. But last year, Congressional Democrats reduced financing for the program for this year by about 60 percent, to about $400 million from the $1 billion it had received in several previous years.

On Thursday, Ms. Spellings had no comment on the study. Amanda Farris, a deputy assistant secretary of education, said in a statement that Ms. Spellings planned to look at the study “to inform our efforts,” and would “look forward to reviewing the final report.”

Ms. Farris said that one of the consistent messages Ms. Spellings has heard from educators, principals and state administrators “is about the effectiveness of the Reading First program in their schools and their disappointment with Congress” for cutting its financing.
There can be all kinds of anecdotal “evidence” that Q or F-3 works but we owe all children, not just suburban ones and not only low-performing ones, best practices that are based on actual results and research rather than political loyalties:
In 2006, John Higgins, the department’s inspector general, reported that federal officials and private contractors with ties to publishers had advised educators in several states to buy reading materials for the Reading First program from those publishers. The Reading First director, Chris Doherty, resigned in 2006, days before the release of Mr. Higgins’s report, which disclosed a number of e-mail messages in which Mr. Doherty referred to contractors or educators who favored alternative curriculums seen as competitors to the Reading First approach as “dirtbags” who he said were “trying to crash our party.”
On NPR, I heard a new teacher say that a parent at her school, a school that had been mostly minority and failing for many years, appreciated the state tests that her daughter was still flunking because she felt it showed that, finally, those in power cared about her child’s education. And one point the teacher made in her segment was that all children deserve well-rounded educations that promote critical thinking, creativity, problems-solving skills and more than test-taking tricks and methods and rote drill. And I have to disagree with the parent–the powers that be still don’t care about your child’s education because your child is being taught to and held accountable for a test that doesn’t necessarily benefit her as much as it gives those powers that be, those adults, cover for not caring about her or most other children’s education. The idea is to raise the test scores of failing schools enough to make it look like something is being done, not to really reform them, not to bring the best practices of the suburbs and magnet schools to every school, and certainly not to fulfill the promise of Brown and desegregate public schools.

With Bush set to leave office, NCLB is being looked at. We’ll see what comes out of it all.

G Bitch (yeah, still)

NOLA

Corps Can Be Sued For MR-GO, Judge Rules

Saturday, May 3rd, 2008 by Loki

DSC02872
In the midst of the Jazz Fest Daily Deluge the following article snuck through between the raindrops:
A federal court judge cleared the way Friday for the Army Corps of Engineers to face trial on claims that defects in its Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet destroyed wetlands and turned the navigation channel into a funnel for storm surge..

U.S. District Judge Stanwood Duval’s 40-page ruling “paves the way for the first and only trial that will likely be held on how the Army Corps of Engineers drowned New Orleans” during Hurricane Katrina, said California attorney Pierce O’Donnell, who leads the legal team that filed the case two years ago on behalf of a group of plaintiffs that includes WDSU-TV anchorman Norman Robinson, who lived in eastern New Orleans.

The suit alleges the controversial shipping channel flooded thousands of homes in eastern New Orleans, the Lower 9th Ward and St. Bernard Parish.
After the way previous suits against the Corps have gone this is a lovely breath of fresh air. In order to engender respect from the community there needs to be responsibility, accountability and some from of pennance besides. Accountability has been evaded because of decades outdated immunities still on the books. Need I remind the world yet again that the winds that hit New Orleans were Cat 2, we were on the weaker backside of the storm. The levees were certified for Cat 3.

Now the Corps is using newspapers to seal the gaps in the levees? Drag them through the court system and enforce accountability.

Without proper flood protection the world will lose a lot, not just the residents of New Orleans. Newsweek said it very well recently:
This subtropical port, which looks to the Mediterranean, Africa and the Caribbean for inspiration, has always marched to the beat of a multitude of different and very funky drummers. Which city has more beguiling street names - Abundance, Beaujolais, Cupid, Desire? Other places have the Rotary and the Elks. New Orleans has Social and Pleasure clubs and the Mardi Gras Indians - African-Americans masquerading as Native Americans in a tradition dating from when Indians and slaves were natural allies. A Mardi Gras Indian designs and sews a new costume every year: one chief put the cost, in time and materials, at $100,000 each. There are secret rituals, songs and chants; even parade routes are classified. Masking is crucial - disguise, misdirection, all in the service of nutty, impractical, unclassifiable mystery - and it’s one key to understanding the city and its culture. New Orleans elevates the chores of daily life to a high level of culture. Porch railings are wrought into sculpture. In the kitchen, the humblest food becomes piquant. Even the funeral procession is an art form. In the wake of Katrina, New Orleans is doing what it does best: making something extraordinary out of next to nothing. There’s no Marshall Plan here - just small miracles in individual neighborhoods. “The culture of New Orleans emanates from the bottom up, not from the top down,” says Ellis Marsalis, pianist, composer and patriarch of the musical clan. The resurrection of the neighborhoods is doubly important because thousands of residents are still trying to come back, and because the city’s culture - particularly its music - is anchored in the neighborhoods. Unless they are revived, “the music won’t have a home anymore,” says saxophonist Donald Harrison Jr., who is also the Big Chief of the Congo Nation, a Mardi Gras Indian tribe. “New Orleans needs the neighborhoods, because it’s the only city in America that retains its traditional styles.”
In the increasingly mobile and digital age the world needs places like New Orleans. This is the last true American bohemia in so many ways, a place with a rich and vibrant (and yes, in many case unfortunate) history.

This is one of those rare moments of sanity over the past three years, I hope it goes the distance!

Now back to my foul weather Jazz Fest Blogging

Loki, Founder and Cat Herder, HumidCity

Memorial

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008 by Loki

9th Ward Memorial

Click the Image to see more pics from Howieluvsus

Humid Haney Finishes FYYFF Stickers as Morris Family Fundraiser

Sunday, April 20th, 2008 by Loki
HumidHaney (No relation to HumidCity, although we did work in a design studio together years ago) has done what he does best: take a meme and boil it down to a great Sticker/Tee Shirt. In this case it is something that fans of the late Ashley Morris will get instantly: FYFF stickers.

FYYFF-150dpi

Show your support of the family Morris as well as your opinion of those who think New Orleans is dead. Purchasing info can be found on Humid Haney’s site.

Funeral For A Friend

Thursday, April 10th, 2008 by Loki

In the morning I will be doing once again that which has become all too familiar in the past two years, laying a friend to his final rest. It seems like everyone has written about how Ashley Morris touched their lives, even those who only knew him from his blogging. From John Pope at the Times-Picayune to the Big Easy Rollergirls (of whom his wife was one) the tributes and goodbyes show how far his reach extended.

Huge of heart as well as frame, “The Perfesser” was a man of unbridled passion for New Orleans. He refused to allow injustice and inhumanity to go unchallenged, speaking up with conviction where others remained silent. He spoke from the heart, shot from the hip, and burned through many a cigar in the process.

In the morning people from around the country will be donning suits, Rollergirl gear, and Saints jerseys as they gather to honor the good Doctor. He would want a huge sendoff and I doubt he will be disappointed. Info on the funeral can be located here, and for those of you who wish to help his wife and children you can donate here.

What passes for eloquence on my part is out of the question now. I just know I miss my friend and want to see his children secure the way he would have wished.

Proud Papa

You rascal, how dare you ease out the back door when we have yet to follow through on all those threats of playing guitar together over Guiness and steaks. I miss you brother.

Once the funeral is out of the way it will be time for some vicious dissection of the inadequacies of our political class. We must all pick up the torch and prevent the fuckmooks from resting easy. He is no longer here to contain his fire so we must all blaze on his behalf.
-Loki, founder HumidCity

Morris Family Update

Tuesday, April 8th, 2008 by Loki

In a surprise move this evening Soviet Block, our own Hana Morris, announced that she will be keeping Ashley’s blog open!

The fundraising efforts are going well on the internet end, something for which I would like to offer my personal thanks. There is still a long way to go, but I have faith in our community. Stop by Remember Ashley Morris and help lift them up.

More soon, I am completely exhausted and must sleep.  

Ashley Morris Fund - Please Help

Sunday, April 6th, 2008 by Loki

A major voice in the New Orleans blogosphere has gone silent, widowing a Rollergirl and orphaning three tiny children. As
various local groups prepare a benefit we see major obstacles looming for the family including five figure expenses for the funeral. Please give what you can, even a few dollar here and there can mount up. There are needs that cannot wait on the fund raising events.

Please join the efforts of HumidCity, Defend New Orleans, NOLA Rising, WTUL, Tales of the Cocktail, The Big Easy Rollergirls, The Skull Club, L’Art Noir, and many more as we show the Morris Family what community really means!

Online Donations can be made at Remember Ashley Morris

If you wish to mail a donation make the check out to Hana Morris and send it to:

HumidCity c/o
George Williams
5500 Prytania St.
PMB #417
New Orleans, LA 70115

If you wish to become involved in the benefit events, donate art for auction, or assist in some other way please contact me directly by emailing me humidcity at gmail dot com

Ashley Morris Memorial. Get yours at   bighugelabs.com/flickr

Perfesser Morris

Saturday, April 5th, 2008 by Loki

IMG_9341

Ashley wants you to laugh, you fuckers!

Corps Category 5 Study Released: Late and Useless

Saturday, March 15th, 2008 by Loki

This content is syndicated from the email by Matt McBride, formerly at the helm of Fix The Pumps. -Loki

Dear New Orleanians,

The Corps has released the preliminary version of their category 5 study:

http://lacpr.usace.army.mil/default.aspx

or the direct link:

http://lacpr.usace.army.mil/default.aspx?p=LACPR_Draft_Technical_Report

They had promised this to the public (after missing their 12/31/07 deadline) on February 8th, as seen here:

http://www.mvn.usace.army.mil/pao/Video/WLAE_Col_Lee_080115.wmv

I went and checked on March 7th, and it hadn’t yet appeared on the LaCPR site. But it’s there now.

By the way, the study doesn’t actually make any recommendations. In fact, here’s an excerpt from the end of the report:
“Efforts to date do not point to a single effective risk reduction strategy. No single strategy for comprehensive hurricane damage risk reduction, other than entirely abandoning communities in South Louisiana, will guarantee safety for the population along the coast.”
Basically, what this study has done is just collect all the alternatives, so that more meetings can be held. The Corps has placed a paragraph in the report meant to blunt criticism that the public was expecting recommendations from this report, and there are none (and, yes, I am aware that was reported earlier, but that doesn’t mean that every member of the public in South Louisiana will remember or care about it):
“Congress also directed a technical report rather than a reconnaissance or feasibility report as described by normal USACE policy. The technical report will contain many of the same components as a reconnaissance or feasibility report, such as presenting the results of the formulation and evaluation of alternatives. As outlined by the Congressional direction, the technical report will contain a ‘comprehensive hurricane protection analysis and design…to develop and present a full range of flood control, coastal restoration, and hurricane protection measures…for comprehensive Category 5 protection.’”
Expect to see that argument when people start asking, “why are there no recommendations other than, ‘have more meetings?’”

Matt

A Pause to Remember…

Friday, January 4th, 2008 by Lord David

There is a Dirge on my doorstep. Last night it was Press Monkeys, darting about and chattering in the cold, shining The Big Light around and aligning, so I knew the Dirge was coming. In fact, I welcome it.

Tomorrow night is the anniversary of the murder of my neighbor, Helen Hill. While there is great sadness in this, too immense for any but her family to understand, especially knowing that their holidays will end each year with this commemoration, there is also something else.

In between the failed expectations of New Elected Officials and the Blunders of City Hall, between the Sloppy Demolition of Homes and Run Away Crime, there is definitely something else.

There is the Dirge; a small group of maybe fifty people, holding candles in the dark, shivering together in the cold, slowly pushing the sound of breaking hearts out of old brass instruments…to remember their friend.

There is no press. The cameras and lights are gone, as far as I can tell, since last nights report or update or whatever it was.

Tonight there is the Dirge, the soundtrack to an amazing act of love. To know such caring and fond rememberence brings a tear to my eyes, as indeed, how could it not. But there’s no speeches being made, no placards, no ribbons worn. There’s something else, so beautiful & rare. Hope.

Tomorrow night, light a candle for Helen Hill, for her husband, her son, our city. Then light one for yourself.

You are the reason, the action, the love, and the hope.

Oh, yes. You are.

 

Lord David

Skull Club
New Orleans

Demolished - A Further New Orleans Tale

Wednesday, January 2nd, 2008 by Loki
(Syndicated from email - Loki)

Dear New Orleanians,
 
Demolition is not a plan. But the city of New Orleans wants to convince everyone, including
its own bureaucrats, of the opposite.
 
Over the past few months, as I’ve studied the workings of demolitions in New
Orleans, I’ve gotten more and more dispirited. There’s no leadership,
no direction, just mixed up mountains of paper and growing numbers of
confused, scared citizens getting victimized by their own city
government. Homeowners discover their nearly restored house is targeted
for demolition, and are forced through all nine circles of hell to
prove to their own city that the city is wrong. And some only discover
this after the home is bulldozed by the city. It’s horrible.
 
I and a few talented individuals have taken upon ourselves to do what the
government should be doing: forcing the city to abide by its own laws
regarding demolition. This has turned into a herculean struggle, as the
degree of intransigence and incompetence in city government has
gradually come to light. Against rather long odds, though, there has
been progress.
 
About three weeks ago, I put out a rather voluminous email about demolitions. I detailed how New Orleans‘ Safety & Permits department was likely avoiding public review of
over 1200 demolitions through various sneaky means. Much has happened
since then, so let me bring you up to speed. There has been progress in
the administrative, legislative, and judicial arenas.
 
Administrative - The city never read the law
 
As I mentioned in my earlier email, in late November the city inked a deal
with DRC Emergency Services, LLC for oversight of federally funded
demolitions. Demolition permits started getting issued to DRC on
December 5th. At first, all the permits were for properties in areas
which did not have any historic protections.
 
However, on Tuesday, December 11th, Safety & Permits started issuing
permits in the historic areas. In my previous email, I had suspected
there was a pile of demolitions in the historic areas ready to go,
likely with damage estimates raised above 70%. I was proved right, as
24 demolition permits were issued to DRC on the 11th for properties
which should have required historic review, but didn’t because their
estimates were raised above 70%. The folks that I’ve been working with
on this issue noticed immediately, and threw up red flags in emails to
Safety & Permits personnel. This led to a nearly immediate change.
 
In previous days, we had discovered a city ordinance which had been on the
books since May 3, 2006. It is section 26-10, and says that any
properties with storm damage estimates above 70% and which were within
National Register Districts (outside of local historic districts) were
supposed to be reviewed by the Historic Districts Landmarks Commission
(HDLC). HDLC is a far better run body than the other historic review
panel - the Housing Conservation District Review Committee (HCDRC).
 
HDLC is interested in historic preservation, it has its own staff, and in
general has a more mature outlook on things. On the other hand, HCDRC
is made up of mostly mid-level city bureaucrats and is chaired by a
representative from the same body issuing demolition permits - Safety
& Permits. HCDRC’s role is to review demolitions of historic
properties outside the city’s local historic districts, while HDLC
reviews the stuff inside the local historic districts.
 
What we found was that those 70% properties inside National Register
Districts had never been sent to HDLC, as the law called for. Three
such properties were included in the 24 that got demo permits on
December 11th.
 
A stink was raised, and no permits were issued to DRC for five days.
Everyone in Safety & Permits and HDLC and DRC and in other sections
of city government had lots of meetings.
As of today, all National Register District property demolitions with estimates above
70% are now being reviewed by HDLC, as required by the law.
 
Unfortunately, at least 130 properties had already slid through Safety & Permits
without the statutory review since May, 2006. You may be wondering how
such a thing could happen? Didn’t Safety & Permits read the law?
The answer is “no.”
 
We have emails from Safety & Permits admitting to such. You’ll find them below. These
emails became part of a lawsuit against the city (more about that
later), so they are now public documents.
 
The emails were between Meg Lousteau, a fellow historic preservationist,
and Ed Horan, the Safety & Permits official charged with reviewing
demolitions for further historic review
From: Meg Lousteau
Sent: Tue 12/11/2007 8:24 PM
To: Edward J. Horan
Subject: demolition question
 
Hi Ed - I want to apologize again for unwittingly involving you in today’s mess.  I have never and would never question your integrity or work ethic, or deliberately put you in a bad situation.  I
hope you understand that my concern, and the concern of many others, is
based on the confusing and varied demolition procedures, and the
difficulty we’ve had in getting information from the department.  From now on, I will contact you first with any questions I have regarding demolitions.
 
On that note, I do have a question that I hope you can help answer.  Below is the municipal code that states that buildings in National Register
districts that have damage assessments at or above 70% are supposed to
be reviewed by HDLC.  To my knowledge (which is, admittedly, incomplete), no such buildings have gone before HDLC.  Am I misreading the ordinance, or has another
ordinance superseded it?  Or maybe it’s in conflict with another law? 
 
Thanks in advance for your help.
 
-Meg
 
Sec. 26-10. Demolitions within national register district.
 
Any structure that is located within a national register district and which
has been determined by the department of safety and permits to be
substantially damaged by Hurricanes Katrina or Rita, and where the
damage is defined as 70 percent or more of the replacement value prior
to the hurricane damage as determined by inspection by the department
of safety and permits, and which structure is constructed below base
flood elevation according to the flood elevation maps issued by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
and in effect as of August 29, 2005, must be reviewed by the staff of
the historic district landmarks commission prior to issuance of a
permit for demolition.
 
(M.C.S., Ord. No. 22226, § 1, 5-3-06 )
In response, on December 13, 2007 , Mr. Horan sent the following email to Ms. Lousteau:
On Dec 13, 2007 8:22 AM , Edward J. Horan < ejhoran@cityofno.com> wrote:
 
Meg,
 
Yesterday was the first time I have ever read Section 26-10 of the City Code. I
have read, re-read, quoted, cut and pasted, and mentally tattooed onto
my brain Section 26-6 of the City Code . I was certain that 26-6 (which
contradicts 26-10) was the Section governing the Housing Conservation
District. I have already alerted both Mr Centineo and Mr Perkins of my
ignorance of 26-10 and can assure you and them that all future
demolition applications will follow the procedure outlined therein.
This morning I will inform the permit analysts of the misunderstanding and of new process as required by law.
 
Edward Horan
Zoning Administrator
City of New Orleans
Department of Safety and Permits
In response, Ms. Lousteau asked on December 13, 2007 as to whether Safety
& Permits would be reviewing their error, and having the permits in
question now reviewed by HDLC. Specifically, she was asking about a
permit application for 1231 S. Rampart St. , issued on December 12,
2007 .
From: Meg Lousteau
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 11:41 AM
To: Edward J. Horan
Cc: Mike Centineo; Elliot Perkins
Subject: Re: demolition question
 
Hi Ed - thank you so much!  I can’t wait to forward this information to my fellow concerned citizens.  It’s a huge relief to know that so many demolitions will now get some kind of review.  We deeply appreciate your help with this.
 
We noticed that at least one property seems to have slipped through the
cracks - the building at 1231 S. Rampart Street , which is in the Central City National Register
District, was issued a demolition permit yesterday.  I could be wrong, but shouldn’t this be going to HDLC?
 
[screenshot of permit application for 1231 S. Rampart St. from velocityhall.com]
 
That brings up another, very important question:  what steps will Safety and Permits take to rescind the erroneously issued permits that should have been reviewed by HDLC?  I think that all eleven I mentioned on Tuesday would now need to be reviewed, as well as many more.  I can try to get a list of them, if that would help.
 
Many thanks,
Meg
Mr. Horan responded on December 14, 2007 :
From: Edward J. Horan
Date: Dec 14, 2007 12:39 PM
Subject: RE: demolition question
To: Meg Lousteau
Cc: Mike Centineo, Elliot Perkins
 
The permit for 1231 S Rampart has not yet been issued, as you can see in
the information below the status is n/a and the fees have not been paid.
 
We will not retroactively apply this Section.  All future applications will be evaluated with Section 26.10.
 
Edward Horan
Zoning Administrator
Dept. of Safety & Permits
Cityof New Orleans
1300 Perdido St. Rm 7E05
New Orleans , LA 70112
So now we know why some (but certainly not all) demolition permits were
not getting proper review. It was because Safety & Permits had not
read the applicable law since it was passed on May 3, 2006. In
addition, they will not correct their error, even though they admit to
it in print.
 
Legislative - Some things need to be changed
 
As I mentioned, about 130 properties were affected (when I say “affected,”
I mean that a review was not performed - I do not mean that a
demolition could have been prevented) by Safety & Permits not
performing their duties as prescribed in law. However, those were only
a small slice of the over 1200 properties which did not receive any
historic review at all before demolition for the last two years. That
includes the batch of demo permits issued to DRC on December 11th (as
well as a few on December 12th, before the pause completely took hold).
Those properties, under the current law, are exempt from review, even
if the city was raising the damage estimates simply to avoid review.
 
The idea of public review of demolitions of historic properties in a town such as New Orleans is excellent, especially considering the giant volume of demolitions
now underway. The city’s housing stock is precious, and any removal of
part of it should be thought through carefully and in public. Not only
is it wise to conserve historic housing, but it is also smart to have
an extra layer of review to prevent mistakes (which have definitely
been made).
 
Unfortunately, the process has been subverted by loopholes in the law which should be
closed. One loophole - the 70% exemption from review - appears to have
no real basis other than accelerating a process that should, by its
nature, be deliberate. It should be repealed. It serves only the
interests of bureaucrats eager to impress their bosses.
 
Another loophole - regarding properties to be demolished under the the Imminent
Health Threat law - also exempts such properties from historic review.
I can’t think of a reason this would be necessary, especially when one
considers the seemingly random and scattershot application of the
Imminent Health Threat law by the city. We are still trying to gather
all the various imminent health threat lists that have been published
over the last year. Thus far, we have collected at least five different
lists with dates from March until December 29th, with some properties
appearing on one list, dropping off the following list, and then
reappearing on a third list.
 
To describe the Imminent Health Threat process as “haphazard” would be
generous. Thus, having a public check on a bureacracy known to make
mistakes is a good thing, and should not be subverted.
 
A little clarification is necessary - Imminent Health Threat properties
are NOT properties about to fall down. Those properties are known as
Imminent Danger of Collapse. If they are truly about to fall down, I
have no problem skipping the historic review step. Imminent Health
Threat properties seem to be whatever Safety & Permits judges them
to be, whether they are an actual threat or not.
 
Unfortunately, the law as it stands now allows all of this tomfoolery by the city
administration. Currently, the city is under no obligation to present
any but a small slice of demolitions for public review, due to the
loopholes in the law. To get those loopholes closed will take
legislative action on the part of the City Council. That particular
part of the story is being worked on actively, and will hopefully bear
fruit in January.
 
Judicial - Appeals process to be enstated
 
Just before the public housing demolition debate captured the city’s
complete attention, another demolition dispute was wending its way
through the courts. A Federal suit had been filed against the city in
August claiming that private homeowners’ due process rights had been
violated by virtue of the city not having a clear administrative
process for review of demolitions. However, until I started slicing and
dicing the numbers, no one was sure of the extent of the problem. When
I found that over 1200 properties had bypassed HCDRC, and over 300 of
them had their estimates increased past 70%, that got the attention of
the lawsuit participants.
 
The lawyers for the plaintiffs in the suit contacted me and asked if I
would write an affadavit describing my analysis of the city’s
demolition permits. I did so, and it was filed on December 18 in
advance of a planned evidentiary hearing in the case.
 
The Times-Picayune got a hold of it and wrote up an article the next day. You can find that article here:
 
City Inflating Damage, Lawsuit Says
Times-Picayune, 12/19/07
 
Many officials - including possibly the mayor - were scheduled to testify at
the hearing. But the city apparently didn’t see the point in fighting
the suit, and agreed to enstate an appeals process for those people who
felt their properties were unfairly targeted for demolition. The paper
covered this as well:
 
Owners Can Appeal Demolition Orders
Times-Picayune, 12/20/07
 
I’m sure this escaped a lot of peoples’ attention, because that was the
same day as the City Council vote on the public housing demolitions.
 
Frankly, the very fact that such a process must be enstated is horrifying. Why
should someone have to worry about their house being demolished out
from underneath them if they have no reason to worry?
 
While this result is nice, it does not address the core problems at hand with
the city’s demolition “process,” which is actually a mishmosh of poorly
managed and poorly documented multiple processes riddled with loopholes.
 
Recommendations
 
1) The 70% exemption from historic review needs to be eliminated.
 
This exemption serves no purpose but to accelerate a process which should be
deliberate. The acceleration is likely to satisfy Federal funding
deadlines, which is not good public policy when one is talking about
the irrevocable act of demolishing a building.
 
2) All properties to be demolished in the Housing Conservation District
must be reviewed by the Housing Conservation District Review Committee,
no matter what the reason for their demolition.
 
The city has been exploiting loopholes in the law to ram through
demolitions without review. This must stop. What is so wrong with
simply reviewing demolitions publicly?
 
3) The city should apply for an extension of the funding cutoff for
demolitions past the current February 29, 2008 date. That is when FEMA
expects the demolitions of approximately 1800 buildings to be completed
through the DRC contract. From what I understand, the city has begun
this process.
 
There are hundreds of HCDRC-eligible and HDLC-eligible properties in that
list, and it will be impossible to adequately review them in time. The
HCDRC only meets every two weeks, which means there’s only 4 or 5
meetings before the funding gets cut off.
 
4) Adequate review means adequate review
 
What I mean by this is timely publication of HCDRC agendas so that
neighborhood organizations, concerned neighbors, and (yes) surprised
homeowners can get to HCDRC meetings to speak their piece about a
demolition. Also those agendas should be compiled in accordance with
the laws of the city
 
We know that is definitely not happening now. On December 26, 2007, the
city published a list of 114 “extra” properties which are being added
to the HCDRC meeting on December 31, 2007 (a previous agenda with
around a dozen properties was issued the previous week). This list is
culled from a bigger master list of properties being given to DRC for
demolition. This is the first in a growing wave of hundreds of
HCDRC-eligible demolitions on the DRC contract.
 
The particulars of this list of 114 “extras” are interesting. All 114
properties have damage estimates below 70%, but many of the properties
are classified as Imminent Health Threats. This gives us a window into
the city’s thinking - they are strongly enforcing the 70% loophole, but
the Imminent Health Threat loophole is not as important anymore.
However, this appears to be a bureaucratic choice on the city’s part.
Their thinking could change at any time - unless the law is changed to
close the loopholes.
 
But of course, even the batch of 114 extra properties is incomplete. We
have the list that the extra agenda items were culled from. There are
properties on that list that probably should appear on the 12-31-07
HCDRC agenda, but do not. On that list, there are:
 
- 21 HCDRC-eligible properties with NO damage estimate (so it is impossible to tell if they are above or below 70%)
- 18 properties with current estimates below 70%. This would appear to
match the rationale for the assembly of the HCDRC agenda, so it is
unclear why these properties are not included.
 
While actually getting notice (however incomplete it may be) ahead of meeting
is a step forward, there is no way people can possibly respond in time
to obscure notice in the classified section of the newspaper if their
property is on this list. Three business days between Christmas
and New Years Day is nuts, but it’s just one more indication of the
hurry-up attitude of a city where demolition has become a proxy for
rebuilding. HCDRC and Safety & Permits must do a better job on
notifications.
 
Conclusion
Some people might wonder why I’m so interested in this. My interest is simple: I want to see government work correctly.
 
A government that flouts its own laws is useless to the people it
supposedly serves. Over the past few weeks, I and my fellow historic
preservationists have struggled mightily to get the city to simply
follow its own legal procedures. The overarching goal of historic
preservation has become secondary to simply following the rules. It
should not be this hard.
 
My heart breaks to see what is happening. But at least there is a little sunshine.
 
Matt


Powered by ScribeFire.

A Message for Jeanne Nathan on the Housing Issue

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007 by Loki

A message from Jeanne Nathan. To respond, email jnyno@aol.com
Dear New Orleans Citizen,

The debate over demolition of public housing buildings in New Orleans has been cast in either/or rhetoric that has undermined any serious consideration of what is the best way to improve communities that were once home for 4500 mostly working families, many of whom are still scattered far from home.

Using the fear of urban crime and drugs as the banner for destroying over 700 sturdy, well built and well designed bricks and mortar buildings, HUD officials have failed to provide the facts, plans or contracts on which New Orleanians can judge the sincerity or appropriateness of their plans for building mixed income housing in their place.

Violent crime in the city has risen since Katrina, despite the fact that most public housing is vacant, and closed off to former tenants, who were, by the way, leaseholders whose possessions still lie frozen in time in their former homes. Violent crime, most of it perpetrated by teen age males against teen age males is rising nation wide. It is a by product of a drug industry that has replaced disappearing entry level manufacturing, port and service jobs. The abandoned urban public school systems have also failed to educate our youth for the increasing high tech and knowledge based economies.

HUD has spread lies about what tenants do and don’t want; how many new affordable apartments it “plans” to create; about how many affordable apartments are available in the city. Former tenants warn that past promises for new development turned out to be a mirage; that new mixed income communities never deliver the promises of affordable apartments. Vast acreage owned by HUD and ready for new developments lies vacant, waiting for new housing units HUD promised long ago.

Our public officials, long silent on these plans, now seem ready to accept HUD’s lies and public policy on face value without further exploration. Our news media has done little better so far, quoting HUD’s numbers, inaccurate depiction of housing, much of it virtually untouched by the storm, as “flood ravaged and obsolete,” and failing to go beyond the street protests to look at the valid arguments against wholesale immediate demolition of 4500 units of housing.

In today’s New York Times Adam Nossiter quotes a former New Orleanian living in southwest Louisiana as saying she opens her windows to listen to the cows for company at night, missing her city, but finding no neighborhood where she once lived.

Anyone who believes HUD’s claims that tenants do not want to return has turned their back on reality and their fellow citizens.

No one can know all the true facts about the need, alternatives and plans for public housing right now. There has simply not been enough examination of the alternatives. Many of us participated in the three phases of planning after the storm, and learned what participation in planning means. HUD regulations require similar planning involvement by its tenants. Yet, in fact, HUD signed preliminary contracts with developers that required wholesale demolition without such participation, setting up a sham series of noon time West Bank meetings only after the contracts were inked.

In the face of this confusion, many professionals familiar with housing, planning, preservation and social issues are calling for a time out. Rather than vote for demolition, they call on the City Council to vote for a moratorium to allow more careful review of the best ways to perhaps demolish some of the buildings in worst disrepair, others that would open streets through the once isolated developments, renovate units as Historic Restoration Inc. did in five older public housing buildings in the St. Thomas projects that became the River Garden complex, and add features that would attract a wide range of tenants, while offering a real one-for-one opportunity for working families to return to these new developments.

Lets take a few months to dig beneath the surface, get the facts straight, and create a more informed mandate for HUD to follow in creating new housing for former and new tenants.

The citizens of New Orleans, whether tenants, neighbors, or residents anywhere in our city, deserve informed decision making and plans. We talked about a new New Orleans in those desperate days after the storm. Lets not abandon that dream so fast.

We are seeking individuals and organizations to communicate with City Council members on these issues no later than tomorrow, before the Council meeting this Thursday. Please use the email addresses below to contact the council members.

Arnie Fielkow - Council Member-At-Large
AFielkow@cityofno.com

Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson –Councilmember-At-Large
jbclarkson@cityofno.com

Shelley Midura - District A
SMidura@cityofno.com

Stacy S. Head - District B
SHead@cityofno.com

James Carter - District C
JCarter@cityofno.com

Cynthia Hedge-Morrell - District D
CHMorrell@cityofno.com

Cynthia Willard-Lewis - District E
CWLewis@cityofno.com

Streetcars A ‘Coming

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007 by Loki

NEW ORLEANSOctober 23, 2007- The New Orleans Regional Transit Authority (RTA) announced that beginning Sunday, November 11, 2007, before the sun rises, the historic Perley Thomas streetcars will once again proudly traverse St. Charles Avenue, from the Central Business District, through the picturesque Garden District to Napoleon Avenue.

We should have the whole route running by 2025 or so at this rate!

District 5 Senate Race: Williams Coverage Roundup

Thursday, October 18th, 2007 by Loki

New Orleans District 5 Senate Race

Metroblogging New Orleans has a brief aside on David Williams (Craig Giesecke attended the “meet the bloggers” gathering at Still Perkin.)

The inimitable Maitri over at VatulBlog has put up her Official Endorsements. I am happy to see that she is wholeheartedly behind my uncle David.

The Gambit’s Endorsements:They like David and Cheryl.

WWW.ELECTDAVIDWILLIAMS.COM


www.electdavidwilliams.com

WhistleBlower Discovers (SURPRISE!) The Pumps are Faulty

Thursday, October 11th, 2007 by Loki